John Dwyer, New york, 1756

John Dwyer and Jacob Blount likely themselves to pay 50 pounds so you can “the Sovering Lord King George the following his Heirs and Successors” to your 29 Can get 1756, for the a wedding bond. The duty stated, “The newest conditions with the duty one while a wedding is supposed ranging from John Dwyer and you can Jemina Long both of so it state off Tyrrell aforementioned, Virgin woman, Now if there is zero lawfull end in to impede new said marriage, then over duty to be emptiness…” 9

Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785

For the 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of your City of Philadelphia, registered into a bond due to the next wedding of Joshua Farrell and you will Mary Anne McCartney. 10 Although this number is commercially with the the end of the fresh Innovative Conflict, it’s still a so good illustration of the new colonial time ties.

“The condition of the duty is such, that in case truth be told there will perhaps not hereafter appear one legitimate assist otherwise obstacle, of the need of any Pre-price, Consanguinity, Affinity, or other merely Bring about anyway, however, your significantly more than-said Joshua Farrell and you will Mary Anne McCartney, can get legitimately Marry; hence there’s no Suit centered before every judge, for otherwise towards any such Pre-contract; and just have if for example the told you People, and each of these, are of complete Period of Twenty one Years, and generally are not according to the University fees out of their Mothers, or feel the full Concur regarding his or her Moms and dads or Guardians respectively on the told you Relationships; while it, or both ones, commonly indented Servants, and you will would and you may will help save harmless and sustain indemnified these-stated John Dickinson Esquire…and shall while doing so save your self harmless and continue maintaining indemnified the new Clergyman, Minister, or Individual that will join the told you Events inside Relationships, for, otherwise by Need away from their thus carrying out; following that it Obligations become Void as well as not one Perception, or else to face in full Push and you will Advantage.”

During my look, I have come across numerous relationship bonds getting my personal forefathers and look sufferers. You to definitely, eg, is the relationships of my personal partner’s next-great-grandparents, Lewis Tharp and you may Joanna Western.

Lewis Tharp and you may Joanna Western have been married Makedonsk kvinner for the Fauquier County, Virginia inside the 1805. The sole checklist one stays of its marriage is the bond, which has new consent off Joanna’s father. As the she was not yet twenty-one, their unique dad, John West, offered his authored permission. The bondsman are William Western, who had been more than likely the fresh sis away from Joanna Western. eleven

George Tharp and you will Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801

A separate bond I came across whenever researching south west nearest and dearest try the wedding thread of George Tharp and you can Polly Noland. The text try dated twelve January 1801 within the Fauquier Condition. John West are brand new bondsman. several

I determined there are two connections ranging from George Tharp along with his bondsman, John Western. First, John West is actually the latest buddy off Polly Noland. Polly’s mommy, “Gemime Noland,” given their own consent to own Polly so you can get married George Tharp, because she wasn’t yet age 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland was the latest cousin out of Bathsehba Arnold, who was the brand new partner of John Western. Jemima was widowed once Polly is hitched, that’s probably why uncle John West try expected as the fresh bondsman.

Next commitment ranging from John Western and you will George Tharp is the fact John Western repaid fees for George Tharp within the 1799 and you will 1800. 13 This might mean that George Tharp try used by John Western, perhaps because the a keen apprentice otherwise slave. Guys who working someone else have been constantly responsible for make payment on taxation of those servants otherwise apprentices. fourteen